Alzahem AM, Aqil M, Alzahrani TA, Aljazaeri AH. Saudi Med J. 2017 May;38(5):482-490
Randomised assignment of 112 patients to either AuraOnce or i-gel groups in which oropharyngeal leak pressure, ease of insertion and fibreoptic viewing were measured. i-gel recorded more favourable leak pressures and superior fibreoptic viewing.
Link to abstract.
4cb1e244-707a-4c48-be8d-dfe1a5ccedbc|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Ladny JR, Bielski K, Szarpak L, Cieciel M, Konski R, Smereka J. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 May; 35(5): 786-787
Manikin study to assess effectiveness of blind intubation through the i-gel, LMA Classic and a standard cuffed tracheal tube, performed by 34 nurses in CPR conditions across two scenarios (with and without chest compressions). Primary measure was time to intubation. i-gel recorded a lower median time to intubation and higher, statistically significant, successful insertion rates in both scenarios. Performing compressions doesn't significantly affect time to perform blind intubation in this setting, but reduces the effectiveness of first intubation attempt. i-gel was faster in both scenarios.
Link to abstract.
Tags :
Ladny JR,
Am J Emerg Med,
Manikin study,
CPR,
Chest compressions,
Nurses,
Fast insertion time,
blind intubation,
vs LMA,
vs tracheal tube,
2017
a4b6c0d5-d343-4b93-aa35-cd5fa8e73577|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Gawlowski P, Smereka J, Madziala M, Szarpak L, Frass M, Robak O. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar; 35(3): 484-487.
Paramedics performed standard intubation and blind intubation in three airway scenarios. Results show that blind intubation with the i-gel was superior to ETI performed by paramedics.
Link to abstract.
04dad7e5-e75a-4249-a8b4-e4d481582b9f|1|2.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Jung YS, Paik H, Min SH, Choo H, Seo M, Bahk JH, Seo JH. Anaesthesia. 2017 Feb;72(2):197-203.
Random allocation of patients into two groups: one with a name-specific verbal command and one using a general term. Time to i-gel removal was quicker in the name group.
Link to abstract.
9614cf39-1388-4ec6-b73c-e1abf5f36891|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Holbery-Morgan L, Angel C, Murphy M, Carew J, Douglas F, Murphy R, Hood N, Rechtman A, Scarff C, Simpson N, Stewardson A, Steinfort D, Radford S, Douglas N, Johnson D. Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Feb;29(1):63-68
Lifesavers in Australia who already use pocket masks and BVMs were trained to use the LMA and i-gel on a manikin. Time to effective ventilation was similar between the pocket mask, BVM and i-gel, but longer for LMA. Authors feel there is a limited role for supraglottic airway devices in this scenario.
Link to abstract.
Tags :
2017,
Holbery-Morgan L,
Emerg Med Australas.,
Manikin study,
vs LMA,
vs pocket mask,
vs BVM,
Lifeguards,
Surfing,
Resuscitation,
Prehospital airway management,
cardiac arrest,
Prehospital CPR,
CPR
c76d1162-a1ae-406d-9b2f-6addb8eac273|1|4.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c