Beleña JM, Núñez M, Vidal A, Gasco C, Alcojor A, Lee P, Pérez JL. Anaesthesist. 2015 Apr;64(4):271-6
140 patients split into device groups, with speed of insertion, success rates, leak pressure and tidal volume evaluated. i-gel proved quicker to insert and generally the results were comparable.
Link to abstract.
297fb8a3-663d-4075-aed3-b894388706bf|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Beleña JM, Núñez M, Vidal A, Gasco C, Alcojor A, Lee P, Pérez JL. Anaesthesist. 2015 Apr;64(4):271-6
140 patients split into two groups: i-gel and LMA Supreme, with insertion time, success rate and leak pressure among the results measured. i-gel was quicker to insert but deemed not as easy. No differences were found in leak pressure.
Link to abstract
dd516f42-604d-4ee4-b9a9-c437f408efea|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c