Mishra SK, Sivaraman B, Balachander H, Naggapa M, Parida S, Bhat RR, Yuvaraj K. Anesth Essays Res. 2015 Sep-Dec;9(3):353-8
60 patients were enrolled to either i-gel or ProSeal groups, with the primary objective to compare sealing pressure. Authors conclude ProSeal gave a better seal.
Link to abstract
5a95bc33-8c91-4769-a46a-60aee8043d94|2|3.5|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Singh RB, Rizvi MM, Rasheed MA, Sarkar A. Anesth Essays Res. 2015 May-Aug;9(2):244-6
Report of a 32-year-old male who became bradychardic and apneic. An i-gel was inserted and the case was managed 'very well'.
Link to abstract
f3824cd7-dc2b-4df6-baf6-5c8d729fc03a|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Elgebaly AS, Eldabaa AA. Anesth Essays Res. 2014 May-Aug;8(2):216-22
49 adult patients were randomly assigned between each device group, with fentanyl doses, hemodynamic parameters and mean arterial pressure among results taken at various points throughout the procedure. i-gel requires less anaesthetic doses in this scenario.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2014,
Elgebaly AS,
Anesth Essays Res,
Anaesthesia,
Hemodynamic parameters,
Fentanyl,
Sevoflurane,
Dosage,
Anaesthetic dose,
vs ETT,
Free
31997820-a7f8-4440-945f-d0aa6545ef5b|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c