Naik L, Bhardwaj N, Sen IM, Sondekoppam RV. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2016;2016:7318595
Study on 120 patients comparing intubation success through i-gel or ILMA. Overall success rate proved lower with i-gel in this scenario, with no differences in secondary outcomes.
2ede33b3-ad8b-40c8-b122-068448627531|1|2.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Mishra SK, Nawaz M, Satyapraksh MV, Parida S, Bidkar PU, Hemavathy B, Kundra P. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2015;2015:705869
After induction of anaesthesia and device insertion, head position was ranomly changed from neutral to flexion, extension and lateral rotation. Leak pressure, fibreoptic view and ventilation scores were among the results measured. Effective ventilation can be performed with both devices, but 'extreme precaution' should be taken in flexion position in ProSeal.
Link to abstract
d4d5bf38-bf8d-42cd-a560-59860003b9eb|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
El-Radaideh K, Alhowary AA, Bani Hani D. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2015;2015:971059
Patients were evenly distributed between the two device groups, with ease and number of insertions, insertion speed and leak pressure amongst outcomes measured. SLIPA appeared to be quicker to insert, however blood staining incidence was higher.
Link to abstract
80584e2f-4051-4ed9-8344-186226b6aeaa|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c