Bielski A, Smereka J, Madziala M, Golik D, Szarpak L. Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jun;178(6):871-882
This manikin study aimed to compare the performance of several supraglottic airway devices (SADs) in different blind intubation scenarios performed by 116 inexperienced physicians. The devices used included i-gel, Air-Q laryngeal airway and Ambu AuraGain. The three devices were tested on a paediatric manikin in three different scenarios, which included normal airway without chest compressions (A), normal airway with continuous chest compressions plus the CORPLUS CPR system (CCS) (B), and difficult airway with continuous chest compressions plus CCS (C). Parameters assessed in this investigation included first intubation success rate, median time to SAD placement, time to endotracheal intubation, as well as ease of intubation. Results have shown that the i-gel performed better in every scenario and in all parameters tested as compared to the other devices. Therefore, these data demonstrated that the i-gel is the most effective device for emergency blind intubation performed by inexperienced physicians in paediatric patients.
Link to abstract.
Tags :
2019,
Bielski A,
Eur J Pediatr,
Manikin study,
Resuscitation,
CPR,
Chest compressions,
intubation success rate,
Novice users,
I-gel vs Air-Q,
I-gel vs laryngeal airway,
I-gel vs Ambu AuraGain,
Paediatric,
CORPLUS,
ease of insertion,
emergency blind intubation
1fc7e6bf-ea3e-4753-816b-8ef08a518c58|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c