McKenna M, Davies M. Anaesthesia 2014; 69(8): 928
A response to the Adelborg et al study (Anaesthesia. 2014 Apr;69(4):343-7), questioning whether manikin simulation "adequately reproduces" the real-life anatomic difficulties experienced in drowning patients.
Link to abstract
c62439ef-53f5-4109-84da-2d48988dd38f|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Baker P, Webber J. Anaesthesia 2014; 69(8): 928-9
A further response to Adelborg et al (Anaesthesia. 2014 Apr;69(4):343-7), expressing concern at this being a manikin study, and suggesting that the “vital issue” is whether a device is “fit for purpose” in the case of a drowning patient.
Link to abstract
bb582a81-e45e-4fca-88ef-581686589464|1|2.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Lofgren B, Adelborg K. Anaesthesia 2014; 69(8): 929-30
A response to the two concerns raised by McKenna (Anaesthesia 2014; 69(8): 928) and Baker (Anaesthesia 2014; 69(8): 928-9), acknowledging that more studies are needed and that there is currently “insufficient evidence” to recommend any specific ventilation technique among lifeguards. They also reiterate their study conclusions.
Link to abstract
4b342ddb-78b1-434d-b07b-ecb29f8174aa|1|4.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Adelborg K, Al-Mashhadi RH, Nielsen LH, Dalgas C, Mortensen MB and Løfgren B. Anaesthesia. 2014 Apr; 69(4): 343-7
Forty lifeguards took part in this manikin study, where time to ventilation and proportion of successful ventilations (both with and without ‘concurrent’ chest compressions) were measured. Mean time to ventilate with i-gel® was 15.6 seconds, compared to 35.2 for Soft Seal and 35.1 for AuraOnce. Authors concluded that ‘most lifeguards preferred the i-gel®’.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2014,
Adelborg K,,
Anaesthesia,
RCT,
Manikin study,
vs Soft Seal,
vs AuraOnce,
Lifeguards,
Drowning patients,
Prehospital airway management,
Chest compressions,
Mean time to ventilation,
Free
fd980dc1-9700-4045-9eed-7df2ef2b1f96|1|1.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c