Henlin T, Sotak M, Kovaricek P, Tyll T, Balcarek L, Michalek P. Biomed Res Int. 2015;201
Prospective, randomised, single-blinded study comparing five supraglottic airway devices (ProSeal LMA, Supreme LMA, SLIPA, Laryngeal Tube Suction-D and i-gel) in low light conditions on 505 patients after induction of general anaesthesia. Insertion time was shortest in Supreme LMA and i-gel groups.
Link to abstract
Tags :
Difficult Airways,
Comparison trial,
RCT,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA Supreme,
vs SLIPA,
vs Laryngeal Tube Suction-D,
Military,
Armed Forces,
Low light,
General Anaesthesia,
Low insertion time,
Novice users,
2015,
Biomed Res Int,
Free
0e25733c-f6a0-4534-9af3-005222b27e67|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Kohama H, Komasawa N, Ueki R, Kaminoh Y, Nishi S. Pediatr Int. 2015;57(1):180-2
Study on performance of air-Q, Ambu Aura-i and i-gel in a manikin simulation, undertaken by 22 novice physicians. Rate of success and insertion time with and without chest compressions were measured.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2015,
Kohama H,
Pediatr Int,
Manikin study,
Paediatric,
Novice users,
Chest compressions,
Resuscitation,
Infant,
Simulation,
Comparison trial,
vs air-Q,
vs Ambu Aura-i,
Free
75068e02-bd37-4608-b5bd-dac5540f665b|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c