Gupta B, Gupta S, Hijam B, Shende P, Rewari V. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2015 Oct-Dec;8(4):188-92
Insertion of i-gel, ProSeal and LMA Classic were studied in prone position. Time to insertion, ease of insertion, bronchoscopic view an insertion score were compared. i-gel was the quickest and easiest to insert.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2015,
Gupta B,
J Emerg Trauma Shock,
Adult,
RCT,
Rescue,
Emergency medicine,
Manikin study,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA,
Prone,
Resuscitation,
Free
e87e652d-e4fe-4c2b-b089-f82fb3b598ab|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Taxak S, Gopinath A, Saini S, Bansal T, Ahlawat MS, Bala M. Saudi J Anaesth. 2015 Oct-Dec;9(4):446-50
40 patients were allocated to either the i-gel or ProSeal group. Insertion of i-gel on first attempt was successful in 17 of 20 patients, compared to 16 for ProSeal, and was faster to insert. Authors conclude ProSeal provided the better seal but insertion was easier with i-gel.
Link to abstract
5e4599ee-3a2b-427f-a58c-77b3005e7976|1|4.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c