Ohchi F, Komasawa N, Imagawa K, Okamoto K, Minami T. J Anesth. 2015 Dec;29(6):887-92
15 novice doctors and 17 with >2 years experience were asked to insert each airway device into a manikin in random order. This was done in a windowless room with all the lights on and again with the lights switched off. Insertion time, insertion success, and participant's own perception of ease of use were all recorded. Ventilation success was lower in both groups when using the ProSeal and cLMA in the dark. Insertion time for these devices was longer in the dark, an effect that was also seen in both groups. Both ProSeal and cLMA were rated as more difficult to use in the dark compared with light conditions and with other devices. These results are thought to be due to the difference in design between these airways and the others used in the study, which are stiffer and anatomically shaped.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2015,
Ohchi F,
J Anesth,
Airway management,
RCT,
Prehospital airway management,
Difficult Airways,
Novice users,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA,
vs LMA Supreme,
vs Laryngeal tube ,
vs air-Q,
Manikin study,
Dark,
No light
caf0174b-c589-4867-9a54-fd52e7c36246|1|2.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Peker G, Takmaz SA, Baltacı B, Başar H, Kotanoğlu M. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2015 Oct;43(5):304-12
Prospective, randomised study on 60 children aged 1-10 years. Insertion attempts and ease, leak pressure and complications were recorded. Results suggest no difference between the devices under these conditions.
Link to abstract
39b0dbcd-e0dd-4399-a5d5-02db339a636f|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Arı DE, Ar AY, Karip CŞ, Siyahkoç İ, Arslan AH, Akgün FN. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2015 Oct;43(5):299-303
Insertion time and successful first attempt incidence were measured within the 50 patients assigned to the device groups. i-gel was quicker to insert with other results 'did not differ'. Authors conclude i-gel may be 'a more advantageous' device compared with LMA.
Link to abstract
29b7ab7f-cc52-4adb-82d5-fd399036175d|1|2.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Gupta B, Gupta S, Hijam B, Shende P, Rewari V. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2015 Oct-Dec;8(4):188-92
Insertion of i-gel, ProSeal and LMA Classic were studied in prone position. Time to insertion, ease of insertion, bronchoscopic view an insertion score were compared. i-gel was the quickest and easiest to insert.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2015,
Gupta B,
J Emerg Trauma Shock,
Adult,
RCT,
Rescue,
Emergency medicine,
Manikin study,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA,
Prone,
Resuscitation,
Free
e87e652d-e4fe-4c2b-b089-f82fb3b598ab|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Mishra SK, Sivaraman B, Balachander H, Naggapa M, Parida S, Bhat RR, Yuvaraj K. Anesth Essays Res. 2015 Sep-Dec;9(3):353-8
60 patients were enrolled to either i-gel or ProSeal groups, with the primary objective to compare sealing pressure. Authors conclude ProSeal gave a better seal.
Link to abstract
5a95bc33-8c91-4769-a46a-60aee8043d94|2|3.5|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c