El-Radaideh K, Alhowary AA, Bani Hani D. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2015;2015:971059
Patients were evenly distributed between the two device groups, with ease and number of insertions, insertion speed and leak pressure amongst outcomes measured. SLIPA appeared to be quicker to insert, however blood staining incidence was higher.
Link to abstract
80584e2f-4051-4ed9-8344-186226b6aeaa|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Henlin T, Sotak M, Kovaricek P, Tyll T, Balcarek L, Michalek P. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:201898
Prospective, randomised, single-blinded study comparing five supraglottic airway devices (ProSeal LMA, Supreme LMA, SLIPA, Laryngeal Tube Suction-D and i-gel) in low light conditions on 505 patients after induction of general anaesthesia. Insertion time was shortest in Supreme LMA and i-gel groups.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2015,
Henlin T ,
Biomed Res Int,
Anaesthesia,
Difficult Airways,
Comparison trial,
Extreme environment,
Low light,
RCT,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA,
vs LMA Supreme,
vs SLIPA,
vs Laryngeal Tube Suction-D
02c676ab-aef9-416f-8f2d-26ba93b1748e|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Choi GJ, Kang H, Baek CW, Jung YH, Woo YC, Cha YJ. Anaesthesia. 2014 Nov;69(11):1258-65
A review of 9 randomised controlled trials suggested that clinical performance of i-gel was similar to LMA, save for leak pressure and fibreoptic view, both of which favoured i-gel.
Link to abstract
3286a0a2-a7bc-4e4e-9c28-6558f9503692|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Leventis C, Chalkias A, Sampanis MA, Foulidou X, Xanthos T. Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(5):371-3
72 briefly-trained paramedics were allocated to intubate a manikin. Success rate was higher, and insertion time 'significantly' shorter for the i-gel group.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2014,
Leventis C ,
Eur J Emerg Med,
Manikin study,
RCT,
Comparison trial,
Paramedics,
Emergency medicine,
Resuscitation,
Prehospital airway management,
Prehospital emergency care,
Trainees
868c56a3-35cf-4fbb-9e06-0872d4127cc6|1|2.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Reza Hashemian SM, Nouraei N, Razavi SS, Zaker E, Jafari A, Eftekhari P, Radmand G, Mohajerani SA, Radpay B. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014 Oct-Dec;4(4):288-92
64 patients assigned to either i-gel or cLMA groups in this randomised controlled trial. Results showed i-gel was 'significantly' quicker to insert.
Link to abstract
daa8290a-8403-484a-b125-ea9c17368648|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c