March JA, Tassey TE, Resurreccion NB, Portela RC, Taylor SE. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 May-Jun;22(3):385-389.
The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the I-Gel airway (IGA) to the King LT laryngotracheal airway (KA) in a simulated tactical scenario. The evaluation was carried out by assessing the time to successful tube placement on a manikin. Participants were also videomonitored to assess their height exposure above the protection barrier. Finally, participants were questioned on which device they preferred with results favouring i-gel.
Link to abstract.
e0bad6d4-c7d9-47bb-b635-8a824cce880f|1|5.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Kohama H, Komasawa N, Ueki R, Kaminoh Y, Nishi S. Pediatr Int. 2015;57(1):180-2
Study on performance of air-Q, Ambu Aura-i and i-gel in a manikin simulation, undertaken by 22 novice physicians. Rate of success and insertion time with and without chest compressions were measured.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2015,
Kohama H,
Pediatr Int,
Manikin study,
Paediatric,
Novice users,
Chest compressions,
Resuscitation,
Infant,
Simulation,
Comparison trial,
vs air-Q,
vs Ambu Aura-i,
Free
75068e02-bd37-4608-b5bd-dac5540f665b|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c