Nirupa R, Gombar S, Ahuja V, Sharma P. Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Oct;60(10):726-731
Prospective, randomised controlled study on 100 patients, with the primary outcome being leak pressure assessed at five minutes. i-gel recorded 'superior' pressure and shorter insertion times compared to ProSeal.
Link to abstract
c92034c2-08ea-4966-8c7a-50d9df3db2e1|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Wetsch WA, Schneider A, Schier R, Spelten O, Hellmich M, Hinkelbein J. Eur J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;22(5):374-6
Manikin study to assess speed of effective ventilation administered in a simulated motor vehicle accident victim, comparing i-gel against tracheal intubation, Ambu AuraOnce and laryngeal tube. Fastest effective ventilation achieved with i-gel.
Link to abstract
Tags :
Difficult Airways,
Manikin study,
Comparison trial,
Reduced access patient,
Road traffic collision victim,
vs ETT,
vs Ambu,
vs Laryngeal Tube Suction-D,
Fast insertion time,
Speed of insertion,
Adult,
2015,
European Journal of Emergency Medicine
3a00ed29-314e-4c71-8004-2b1372164ad9|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Beleña JM, Núñez M, Vidal A, Gasco C, Alcojor A, Lee P, Pérez JL. Anaesthesist. 2015 Apr;64(4):271-6
140 patients split into device groups, with speed of insertion, success rates, leak pressure and tidal volume evaluated. i-gel proved quicker to insert and generally the results were comparable.
Link to abstract.
297fb8a3-663d-4075-aed3-b894388706bf|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c