Beleña JM, Núñez M, Vidal A, Gasco C, Alcojor A, Lee P, Pérez JL. Anaesthesist. 2015 Apr;64(4):271-6
140 patients split into two groups: i-gel and LMA Supreme, with insertion time, success rate and leak pressure among the results measured. i-gel was quicker to insert but deemed not as easy. No differences were found in leak pressure.
Link to abstract
dd516f42-604d-4ee4-b9a9-c437f408efea|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Henlin T, Sotak M, Kovaricek P, Tyll T, Balcarek L, Michalek P. Biomed Res Int. 2015;201
Prospective, randomised, single-blinded study comparing five supraglottic airway devices (ProSeal LMA, Supreme LMA, SLIPA, Laryngeal Tube Suction-D and i-gel) in low light conditions on 505 patients after induction of general anaesthesia. Insertion time was shortest in Supreme LMA and i-gel groups.
Link to abstract
Tags :
Difficult Airways,
Comparison trial,
RCT,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA Supreme,
vs SLIPA,
vs Laryngeal Tube Suction-D,
Military,
Armed Forces,
Low light,
General Anaesthesia,
Low insertion time,
Novice users,
2015,
Biomed Res Int,
Free
0e25733c-f6a0-4534-9af3-005222b27e67|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Mukadder S, Zekine B, Erdogan KG, Ulku O, Muharrem U, Saim Y, Mahmut D. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:634320
105 patients were randomly distributed between the three device groups. Initial leak pressure, insertion time, ease of placement and airway morbidity results all favoured the i-gel.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2015,
Mukadder S,
ScienfiticWorldJournal,
Adult,
Anaesthesia,
Comparison trial,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA Supreme,
Gynaecologic surgery,
Laparoscopic,
Free
03380d16-91cd-45cd-8f5f-d929cbc57416|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Henlin T, Sotak M, Kovaricek P, Tyll T, Balcarek L, Michalek P. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:201898
Prospective, randomised, single-blinded study comparing five supraglottic airway devices (ProSeal LMA, Supreme LMA, SLIPA, Laryngeal Tube Suction-D and i-gel) in low light conditions on 505 patients after induction of general anaesthesia. Insertion time was shortest in Supreme LMA and i-gel groups.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2015,
Henlin T ,
Biomed Res Int,
Anaesthesia,
Difficult Airways,
Comparison trial,
Extreme environment,
Low light,
RCT,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA,
vs LMA Supreme,
vs SLIPA,
vs Laryngeal Tube Suction-D
02c676ab-aef9-416f-8f2d-26ba93b1748e|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Kang F, Li J, Chai X, Yu J, Zhang H, Tang C. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015 Jan;27(1):37-41
Patients were randomised between the two groups, with device inserted in supine position. Insertion time and attempts, airway peak pressure and complications were among results measured. i-gel provided a higher airway seal pressure in the prone position and both devices recorded low complication rates.
Link to abstract
9419664e-b495-4f32-b27d-52f725d2bf8d|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c