Taxak S, Gopinath A, Saini S, Bansal T, Ahlawat MS, Bala M. Saudi J Anaesth. 2015 Oct-Dec;9(4):446-50
40 patients were allocated to either the i-gel or ProSeal group. Insertion of i-gel on first attempt was successful in 17 of 20 patients, compared to 16 for ProSeal, and was faster to insert. Authors conclude ProSeal provided the better seal but insertion was easier with i-gel.
Link to abstract
5e4599ee-3a2b-427f-a58c-77b3005e7976|1|4.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Goyal R. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Oct-Dec;31(4):440-9
Overview of currently available options in paediatric sizes, suitability of each, published data and general concerns regarding their use.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2015,
Goyal R,
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol,
Review,
Paediatric,
vs air-Q,
vs Ambu Aura,
vs LMA,
vs Laryngeal tube suction ,
vs Flexible LMA,
vs Cobra,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA Supreme,
fibreoptic ,
Free
cde85dbd-1618-4f61-a671-a17e46eaae85|1|4.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Mishra SK, Sivaraman B, Balachander H, Naggapa M, Parida S, Bhat RR, Yuvaraj K. Anesth Essays Res. 2015 Sep-Dec;9(3):353-8
60 patients were enrolled to either i-gel or ProSeal groups, with the primary objective to compare sealing pressure. Authors conclude ProSeal gave a better seal.
Link to abstract
5a95bc33-8c91-4769-a46a-60aee8043d94|2|3.5|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Zhang JQ, Meng FM, Xue FS, Li RP. Saudi Med J. 2015 Sep;36(9):1130
Questions raised as to the interpretation of results given, particularly user experience and insertion method of ProSeal. Response from original study author is also declared within.
Link to abstract
c08a0f29-aa59-48f0-82e5-a7147482e42f|1|5.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Sanket B, Ramavakoda CY,Nishtala MR, Ravishankar CK, Ganigara A. AANA J. 2015 Aug;83(4):275-80
Study to compare efficacy of each device on patients aged up to 10 years. Ease of insertion, time to insertion and oropharyngeal leak pressure were some of the measurements taken. Insertion time was significantly faster with i-gel.
Link to abstract
130b8662-187d-46e1-b723-dd4894edf80f|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c