Komasawa N, Ueki R, Kaminoh Y, Nishi S. J Anesth. 2014 Oct;28(5):676-80
Insertion time and successful ventilation rate were measured, with the latter unaffected by chest compression.
Link to abstract
dadd35b3-dfbf-4d2f-9a01-d10e7081956d|1|1.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Leventis C, Chalkias A, Sampanis MA, Foulidou X, Xanthos T. Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(5):371-3
72 briefly-trained paramedics were allocated to intubate a manikin. Success rate was higher, and insertion time 'significantly' shorter for the i-gel group.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2014,
Leventis C ,
Eur J Emerg Med,
Manikin study,
RCT,
Comparison trial,
Paramedics,
Emergency medicine,
Resuscitation,
Prehospital airway management,
Prehospital emergency care,
Trainees
868c56a3-35cf-4fbb-9e06-0872d4127cc6|1|2.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Reza Hashemian SM, Nouraei N, Razavi SS, Zaker E, Jafari A, Eftekhari P, Radmand G, Mohajerani SA, Radpay B. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014 Oct-Dec;4(4):288-92
64 patients assigned to either i-gel or cLMA groups in this randomised controlled trial. Results showed i-gel was 'significantly' quicker to insert.
Link to abstract
daa8290a-8403-484a-b125-ea9c17368648|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Komasawa N, Ueki R, Kaminoh Y, Nishi SI. J Anesth 2014; 28(5): 676-80
A group of 20 novice physicians inserted the named devices into manikins with or without chest compressions, whereupon insertion time and successful ventilation rate were measured. In cases of successful ventilation, blind tracheal intubation via the inserted device was performed. Chest compression did not significantly decrease ventilation success rates in each device, however insertion time with i-gel® did suffer, according to the authors.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2014,
Komasawa N,,
J Anesth,
Manikin study,
Chest compressions,
Blind tracheal intubation,
vs air-Q,
vs aura-i,
vs Fastrack,
Free
1e20df81-60a4-4df8-8c5a-c2b80b6efda4|1|2.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c