Wetsch WA, Schneider A, Schier R, Spelten O, Hellmich M, Hinkelbein J. Eur J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;22(5):374-6
Manikin study to assess speed of effective ventilation administered in a simulated motor vehicle accident victim, comparing i-gel against tracheal intubation, Ambu AuraOnce and laryngeal tube. Fastest effective ventilation achieved with i-gel.
Link to abstract
Tags :
Difficult Airways,
Manikin study,
Comparison trial,
Reduced access patient,
Road traffic collision victim,
vs ETT,
vs Ambu,
vs Laryngeal Tube Suction-D,
Fast insertion time,
Speed of insertion,
Adult,
2015,
European Journal of Emergency Medicine
3a00ed29-314e-4c71-8004-2b1372164ad9|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Henlin T, Sotak M, Kovaricek P, Tyll T, Balcarek L, Michalek P. Biomed Res Int. 2015;201
Prospective, randomised, single-blinded study comparing five supraglottic airway devices (ProSeal LMA, Supreme LMA, SLIPA, Laryngeal Tube Suction-D and i-gel) in low light conditions on 505 patients after induction of general anaesthesia. Insertion time was shortest in Supreme LMA and i-gel groups.
Link to abstract
Tags :
Difficult Airways,
Comparison trial,
RCT,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA Supreme,
vs SLIPA,
vs Laryngeal Tube Suction-D,
Military,
Armed Forces,
Low light,
General Anaesthesia,
Low insertion time,
Novice users,
2015,
Biomed Res Int,
Free
0e25733c-f6a0-4534-9af3-005222b27e67|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Henlin T, Sotak M, Kovaricek P, Tyll T, Balcarek L, Michalek P. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:201898
Prospective, randomised, single-blinded study comparing five supraglottic airway devices (ProSeal LMA, Supreme LMA, SLIPA, Laryngeal Tube Suction-D and i-gel) in low light conditions on 505 patients after induction of general anaesthesia. Insertion time was shortest in Supreme LMA and i-gel groups.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2015,
Henlin T ,
Biomed Res Int,
Anaesthesia,
Difficult Airways,
Comparison trial,
Extreme environment,
Low light,
RCT,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA,
vs LMA Supreme,
vs SLIPA,
vs Laryngeal Tube Suction-D
02c676ab-aef9-416f-8f2d-26ba93b1748e|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Schunk D, Ritzka M, Graf B, Trabold B. Emerg Med J 2012; 0: 1–4
66 healthcare professionals of differing experience in paediatric airway management participated in a study comparing laryngeal masks, i-gel® and laryngeal tube. Separated into three groups and after brief training in each, the participants were asked to place the device. Positioning and time to insert were recorded. Results show that i-gel® is superior to both laryngeal mask and laryngeal tube under these circumstances.
Link to abstract.
00dae30f-daa4-4d93-99c5-5d9047c33b83|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Castle N, Pillay Y, Spencer N. Anaesthesia 2011; 66(11): 983-8
Six different supraglottic airway devices, including i-gel®, were tested by 58 paramedics for speed and ease of insertion in a manikin, whilst wearing either a standard uniform or chemical, biological, radiation, nuclear-person protective equipment (CBRN-PPE). During the latter test, i-gel® was the fastest of the six to insert with a mean insertion time of 19 seconds. Overall, the wearing of CBRN-PPE has a detrimental effect on insertion time of supraglottic airways.
Link to abstract.
Tags :
2011,
Castle N,,
Anaesthesia,
Adult,
Emergency medicine,
Resuscitation,
Paramedics,
PPE,
Difficult Airways,
Extreme environment,
vs Combitube,
vs LMA,
vs LMA Fastrach,
vs Laryngeal Tube Suction-D,
vs ProSeal,
Free
d2683af3-61e1-43b8-be36-b6d6c30bf18d|1|2.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c