Choi HY, Kim W, Jang YS, Kang GH, Kim JG, Kim H. Emerg Med Int. 2019 Oct 31;2019:8913093
This prospective randomized crossover manikin study investigated the intubation performance of I-gel blind intubation (IGI) in comparison to I-gel bronchoscopic intubation (IBRI) and intubation using Macintosh Laryngoscope (MCL). 23 emergency physicians carried out intubations with two different types of ET tubes while performing chest compressions. Assessed outcomes included intubation time (primary) cumulative success rate for each intubation time was significantly shorter as compared to the IBRI and MCL using both ET tubes. On the other hand, the performance of polyvinyl chloride and wire reinforced silicon tubes were comparable for each intubation technique. Moreover, the IGI approach reached 100% intubation success rate in a significantly shorter amount of time as compared to the other techniques. Therefore, the IGI technique is a safe and effective approach when carrying out intubations in emergency scenarios that can be used by experienced intubators when administering chest compressions.
Link to abstract.
Tags :
2019,
Choi HY,
Emerg Med Int,
Randomised cross over study,
Manikin study,
blind intubation,
Macintosh laryngoscope,
emergency blind intubation,
ET tubes,
intubation time,
Chest compressions
f5043795-18df-47e0-82d5-9d76c4b9ff3e|2|1.5|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Bielski A, Smereka J, Madziala M, Golik D, Szarpak L. Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jun;178(6):871-882
This manikin study aimed to compare the performance of several supraglottic airway devices (SADs) in different blind intubation scenarios performed by 116 inexperienced physicians. The devices used included i-gel, Air-Q laryngeal airway and Ambu AuraGain. The three devices were tested on a paediatric manikin in three different scenarios, which included normal airway without chest compressions (A), normal airway with continuous chest compressions plus the CORPLUS CPR system (CCS) (B), and difficult airway with continuous chest compressions plus CCS (C). Parameters assessed in this investigation included first intubation success rate, median time to SAD placement, time to endotracheal intubation, as well as ease of intubation. Results have shown that the i-gel performed better in every scenario and in all parameters tested as compared to the other devices. Therefore, these data demonstrated that the i-gel is the most effective device for emergency blind intubation performed by inexperienced physicians in paediatric patients.
Link to abstract.
Tags :
2019,
Bielski A,
Eur J Pediatr,
Manikin study,
Resuscitation,
CPR,
Chest compressions,
intubation success rate,
Novice users,
I-gel vs Air-Q,
I-gel vs laryngeal airway,
I-gel vs Ambu AuraGain,
Paediatric,
CORPLUS,
ease of insertion,
emergency blind intubation
1fc7e6bf-ea3e-4753-816b-8ef08a518c58|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Tracy MB, Priyadarshi A, Goel D, Lowe K, Huvanandana J, Hinder M. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 May;103(3)
This manikin study assessed and compared the delivered ventilation of seven, size 1 LMA devices with two different face masks using self-inflating bags (SIBs). 40 participants carried out resuscitation on a specialised infant training manikin using the LMAs and the face masks in a random fashion. Findings have shown that the i-gel had the highest peak inspiratory pressure and higher PEEP compared to the other devices. In addition, the i-gel showed no insertion failures and all users described it as easy to use. Thus, these results indicate that the i-gel may become the primary resuscitation device used for newborn resuscitation.
Link to abstract.
Tags :
2018,
Tracy MB,
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,
Manikin study,
Paediatric,
Resuscitation,
Neonatal resuscitation,
Newborn,
PEEP,
peak inspiratory pressure,
LMA ,
self-inflating bags,
face mask,
I-gel vs face mask
85f55445-4099-4d9b-8404-2d03ce77f931|1|5.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Ladny JR, Bielski K, Szarpak L, Cieciel M, Konski R, Smereka J. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 May; 35(5): 786-787
Manikin study to assess effectiveness of blind intubation through the i-gel, LMA Classic and a standard cuffed tracheal tube, performed by 34 nurses in CPR conditions across two scenarios (with and without chest compressions). Primary measure was time to intubation. i-gel recorded a lower median time to intubation and higher, statistically significant, successful insertion rates in both scenarios. Performing compressions doesn't significantly affect time to perform blind intubation in this setting, but reduces the effectiveness of first intubation attempt. i-gel was faster in both scenarios.
Link to abstract.
Tags :
Ladny JR,
Am J Emerg Med,
Manikin study,
CPR,
Chest compressions,
Nurses,
Fast insertion time,
blind intubation,
vs LMA,
vs tracheal tube,
2017
a4b6c0d5-d343-4b93-aa35-cd5fa8e73577|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Gawlowski P, Smereka J, Madziala M, Szarpak L, Frass M, Robak O. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar; 35(3): 484-487.
Paramedics performed standard intubation and blind intubation in three airway scenarios. Results show that blind intubation with the i-gel was superior to ETI performed by paramedics.
Link to abstract.
04dad7e5-e75a-4249-a8b4-e4d481582b9f|1|2.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c