Henlin T, Sotak M, Kovaricek P, Tyll T, Balcarek L, Michalek P. Biomed Res Int. 2015;201
Prospective, randomised, single-blinded study comparing five supraglottic airway devices (ProSeal LMA, Supreme LMA, SLIPA, Laryngeal Tube Suction-D and i-gel) in low light conditions on 505 patients after induction of general anaesthesia. Insertion time was shortest in Supreme LMA and i-gel groups.
Link to abstract
Tags :
Difficult Airways,
Comparison trial,
RCT,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA Supreme,
vs SLIPA,
vs Laryngeal Tube Suction-D,
Military,
Armed Forces,
Low light,
General Anaesthesia,
Low insertion time,
Novice users,
2015,
Biomed Res Int,
Free
0e25733c-f6a0-4534-9af3-005222b27e67|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
El-Radaideh K, Alhowary AA, Bani Hani D. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2015;2015:971059
Patients were evenly distributed between the two device groups, with ease and number of insertions, insertion speed and leak pressure amongst outcomes measured. SLIPA appeared to be quicker to insert, however blood staining incidence was higher.
Link to abstract
80584e2f-4051-4ed9-8344-186226b6aeaa|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Henlin T, Sotak M, Kovaricek P, Tyll T, Balcarek L, Michalek P. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:201898
Prospective, randomised, single-blinded study comparing five supraglottic airway devices (ProSeal LMA, Supreme LMA, SLIPA, Laryngeal Tube Suction-D and i-gel) in low light conditions on 505 patients after induction of general anaesthesia. Insertion time was shortest in Supreme LMA and i-gel groups.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2015,
Henlin T ,
Biomed Res Int,
Anaesthesia,
Difficult Airways,
Comparison trial,
Extreme environment,
Low light,
RCT,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA,
vs LMA Supreme,
vs SLIPA,
vs Laryngeal Tube Suction-D
02c676ab-aef9-416f-8f2d-26ba93b1748e|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Jindal P, Rizvi A, Sharma JP. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2009; 20(1): 53-58
This study compared i-gel® to two other supraglottic airways in respect of haemodynamic changes, including heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and rate pressure product. The authors concluded that ‘i-gel® effectively conforms to the perilaryngeal anatomy despite the lack of an inflatable cuff, it consistently achieves proper positioning for supraglottic ventilation and causes fewer haemodynamic changes as compared to other supraglottic airway devices.’
Link to abstract.
a43e0a78-7c61-4930-b1b0-f289c03db14d|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Jackson KM, Cook TM. Anaesthesia. 2007 Apr;62(4):388-93
The airway arm of this trial compared devices including i-gel, Cobra, SLIPA and Laryngeal Tube Suction II. Each device was inserted twice into each manikin by ten anaesthetists, with each insertion scored and ranked. No one manikin outranked the others for all devices. i-gel insertion was 'significantly the easiest'.
Link to abstract
Tags :
Jackson K,
Cook TM ,
Free,
Anaesthesia,
Manikin study,
vs Cobra,
vs SLIPA,
vs Laryngeal tube suction ,
vs Airway Management Device,
vs Combitube,
vs Laryngeal tube ,
vs Laryngeal tube suction II,
vs Laryngeal tube disposable,
2007
b336c2d7-465b-4c25-923d-2d83e724809d|1|1.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c