Mishra SK, Nawaz M, Satyapraksh MV, Parida S, Bidkar PU, Hemavathy B, Kundra P. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2015;2015:705869
After induction of anaesthesia and device insertion, head position was ranomly changed from neutral to flexion, extension and lateral rotation. Leak pressure, fibreoptic view and ventilation scores were among the results measured. Effective ventilation can be performed with both devices, but 'extreme precaution' should be taken in flexion position in ProSeal.
Link to abstract
d4d5bf38-bf8d-42cd-a560-59860003b9eb|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
El-Radaideh K, Alhowary AA, Bani Hani D. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2015;2015:971059
Patients were evenly distributed between the two device groups, with ease and number of insertions, insertion speed and leak pressure amongst outcomes measured. SLIPA appeared to be quicker to insert, however blood staining incidence was higher.
Link to abstract
80584e2f-4051-4ed9-8344-186226b6aeaa|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Henlin T, Sotak M, Kovaricek P, Tyll T, Balcarek L, Michalek P. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:201898
Prospective, randomised, single-blinded study comparing five supraglottic airway devices (ProSeal LMA, Supreme LMA, SLIPA, Laryngeal Tube Suction-D and i-gel) in low light conditions on 505 patients after induction of general anaesthesia. Insertion time was shortest in Supreme LMA and i-gel groups.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2015,
Henlin T ,
Biomed Res Int,
Anaesthesia,
Difficult Airways,
Comparison trial,
Extreme environment,
Low light,
RCT,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA,
vs LMA Supreme,
vs SLIPA,
vs Laryngeal Tube Suction-D
02c676ab-aef9-416f-8f2d-26ba93b1748e|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Kang F, Li J, Chai X, Yu J, Zhang H, Tang C. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015 Jan;27(1):37-41
Patients were randomised between the two groups, with device inserted in supine position. Insertion time and attempts, airway peak pressure and complications were among results measured. i-gel provided a higher airway seal pressure in the prone position and both devices recorded low complication rates.
Link to abstract
9419664e-b495-4f32-b27d-52f725d2bf8d|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Smith P, Bailey CR. Anaesthesia. 2015 Jan;70(1):84-92
Review of 62 published articles, including 14 randomised controlled trials, comparing i-gel with other supraglottic airway devices in children. Leak pressure was found to be the most common primary outcome. Authors conclude i-gel is 'at least equivalent' to other devices, and may give higher leak pressures and improved fibreoptic view of the glottis.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2015,
Smith P,
Anaesthesia,
Paediatric,
Comparison trial,
Review,
vs LMA,
vs LMA Supreme,
vs ProSeal,
vs AuraOnce,
Free
30e8cbbf-20a7-485b-95ed-155f3a45b1b3|1|1.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c