Alzahem AM, Aqil M, Alzahrani TA, Aljazaeri AH. Saudi Med J. 2017 May;38(5):482-490
Randomised assignment of 112 patients to either AuraOnce or i-gel groups in which oropharyngeal leak pressure, ease of insertion and fibreoptic viewing were measured. i-gel recorded more favourable leak pressures and superior fibreoptic viewing.
Link to abstract.
4cb1e244-707a-4c48-be8d-dfe1a5ccedbc|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Ladny JR, Bielski K, Szarpak L, Cieciel M, Konski R, Smereka J. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 May; 35(5): 786-787
Manikin study to assess effectiveness of blind intubation through the i-gel, LMA Classic and a standard cuffed tracheal tube, performed by 34 nurses in CPR conditions across two scenarios (with and without chest compressions). Primary measure was time to intubation. i-gel recorded a lower median time to intubation and higher, statistically significant, successful insertion rates in both scenarios. Performing compressions doesn't significantly affect time to perform blind intubation in this setting, but reduces the effectiveness of first intubation attempt. i-gel was faster in both scenarios.
Link to abstract.
Tags :
Ladny JR,
Am J Emerg Med,
Manikin study,
CPR,
Chest compressions,
Nurses,
Fast insertion time,
blind intubation,
vs LMA,
vs tracheal tube,
2017
a4b6c0d5-d343-4b93-aa35-cd5fa8e73577|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Gawlowski P, Smereka J, Madziala M, Szarpak L, Frass M, Robak O. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar; 35(3): 484-487.
Paramedics performed standard intubation and blind intubation in three airway scenarios. Results show that blind intubation with the i-gel was superior to ETI performed by paramedics.
Link to abstract.
04dad7e5-e75a-4249-a8b4-e4d481582b9f|1|2.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Metterlein T, Dintenfelder A, Plank C, Graf B, Roth G. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2017 Mar - Apr;67(2):166-171
Random assignment of 52 adult patients to different supraglottic devices, from: Laryngeal Tube, LMA, i-gel, LMA Unique, LMA Supreme and Aura-once. After successful ventilation, device positioning was examined to assess glottic opening. Glottic view ranged from 40% for Laryngeal Tube to 90%, with i-gel recording 70%.
Link to abstract.
ccbed67c-b455-4955-a35f-5945b2d6ccdf|1|1.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
An J, Nam SB, Lee JS, Lee J, Yoo H, Lee HM, Kim MS. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jan;96(1):e5801
Authors conducted a specialised search of study databases for eligible randomised controlled trials, setting device insertion time and first-attempt insertion success rate as their primary outcomes. In the 14 RCTs included, i-gel was faster than the majority of other supraglottic airways, with only three others recording shorter insertion times. Authors concluded that the 'unapparent advantage' of insertion success rate indicated the need for further evidence gathering in this area.
Link to abstract.
Tags :
2017,
An J,
Medicine (Baltimore),
RCTs,
Meta-analysis,
Review,
Insertion success rate,
Fast insertion time,
vs LMA,
vs LMA Fastrach,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA Unique,
vs Laryngeal tube ,
vs Combitube,
vs EasyTube,
vs LMA Supreme,
vs aura-i,
vs air-Q,
Manikin study
3078c3a6-ac94-4115-834b-506513077209|1|1.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c