Wojewodzka-Zelezniakowicz M, Majer J. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan 16.
Manikin study to compare the efficacy of ETI performed by 27 nurses using the i-gel as a guide with/without chest compressions. Results showed that in this scenario, nurses were able to perform blind intubation using the i-gel with 'high efficiency'.
Link to abstract.
5f4188d3-cf5e-4779-8f7b-0c61085fa1e3|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Melissopoulou T, Stroumpoulis K, Sampanis M A, Vrachnis N, Papadopoulos G, Chalkias A, Xanthos T. Heart Lung. 2014 Mar-Apr; 43(2): 112-6
A group of 45 nurses inserted the i-gel® and ILMA in a manikin with and without continuous chest compressions. ILMA proved more successful than the i-gel®, but continuation of compressions caused higher insertion times in both devices. Authors conclude that nursing staff can use both devices ‘as conduits with comparable success rates, regardless of whether chest compressions are interrupted or not’.
Link to abstract
caee3229-4e46-40b5-b424-13b4d63f8f94|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Halgawi A, Massicotte N, Lallo A, Gauthier A, Boudreault D, Ruel M, Girard F. Anesth Analg. 2012; 114(1): 152-156
160 patients were randomised for blind intubation via i-gel® or LMA Fastrach®. First attempt and overall success rates were recorded and time to intubation was measured.
Link to abstract.
Tags :
2012,
Halgawi A,,
Anesth Analg,
Adult,
Anaesthesia,
blind intubation,
vs LMA Fastrach,
Tracheal intubation,
RCT,
Free
99d2c286-7877-475e-9c7d-b0f171bfc104|1|4.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c