Monclus E, Garces A, Vassileva I, Sanchez A, Banchs R. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27(47): 155
70 children who were already scheduled for a cranial MRI scan took part in this study. The epiglottis was found to be in the bowl of the i-gel® in all patients, however the device still performed well.
Link to abstract.
1bc16198-ddf0-4527-86ab-dfe632017760|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Zaballos M, Bastida E, del Castillo T, de Villoria JG, Jiménez C. Anaesthesia 2010; 65(6): 569-572
In this study, the artefacts created during MRI by six supraglottic airways, the Classic LMA®, the ProSeal LMA®, the LMA Unique®, the LMA Supreme®, the Ambu® disposable laryngeal mask and the i-gel® were investigated. There were no artefacts with the i-gel® or Ambu® devices.
Abstract text
c453adef-37b7-49c3-9a72-6f4b5c5b4897|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Acott CJ. Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine 2008; 38(3): 124-127
This study looked at the use of i-gel® in airway management of a patient in a diving bell or deck decompression chamber. The study highlighted the potential limitations of some supraglottic airways used in Hyperbaric Medicine, such as possible cuff expansion with a decrease in pressure on decompression and change in cuff volume due to gas diffusion as the gas mixtures change, problems not associated with i-gel®. It showed that, subjectively, there was no change in the consistency of the i-gel® at 203 and 283kPa pressure and that no bubbles were detected following decompression from 203, 283 or 608kPa. The i-gel® was also preferred by the Diver Medical Technicians (DMTs) to the alternative device included in the manikin section of the study because it ‘lacked a cuff and was easier to insert from any position’.
Link to abstract.
1a1508ed-64c5-4138-8685-152bee1a8420|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c