Hagberg CA. A A Case Rep. 2014 Aug 15;3(4):51-2
Comment on two case reports by Schaer et al and de Graaff et al in which the importance of evaluating risk factors for difficult supraglottic airway use were highlighted. Author focuses on the importance of understanding recommended insertion techniques as part of greater knowledge of SADs.
Link to abstract
f1f6639f-eb8e-4d47-85bc-3eec82f2a017|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
de Graaff HJ, Teeuw R, de Quelerij M, Verbrugge SJ, Boudesteijn EA. A A Case Rep. 2014 Aug 15;3(4):48-50
A case of extensive soft palate ulceration after the use of i-gel.
Link to abstract
6609c9bf-b243-4046-a253-9d73945d7db8|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Baker P, Webber J. Anaesthesia 2014; 69(8): 928-9
A further response to Adelborg et al (Anaesthesia. 2014 Apr;69(4):343-7), expressing concern at this being a manikin study, and suggesting that the “vital issue” is whether a device is “fit for purpose” in the case of a drowning patient.
Link to abstract
bb582a81-e45e-4fca-88ef-581686589464|1|2.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Lofgren B, Adelborg K. Anaesthesia 2014; 69(8): 929-30
A response to the two concerns raised by McKenna (Anaesthesia 2014; 69(8): 928) and Baker (Anaesthesia 2014; 69(8): 928-9), acknowledging that more studies are needed and that there is currently “insufficient evidence” to recommend any specific ventilation technique among lifeguards. They also reiterate their study conclusions.
Link to abstract
4b342ddb-78b1-434d-b07b-ecb29f8174aa|1|4.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Kapoor S, Jethava DD, Gupta P, Jethava D, Kumar A. Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;58(4):397-402.
Two randomised groups were assigned either device and after insertion, blind tracheal intubation was attempted. Success at first attempt and overall intubation success rates were assessed. Authors concluded that the i-gel is 'a better device' for rescue ventilation.
Link to abstract.
a86f6579-d062-48ff-b621-4c039bfbf6bd|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c