Pournajafian A, Alimian M, Rokhtabnak F, Ghodraty M, Mojri M. Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Mar 30;5(2):e22068
A single-blind randomised trial on 61 patients allocated into i-gel and LMA Classic groups. Airway placement was categorised into three groups: first, second and third attempts. Success rate, insertion time and postoperative complications were measured. i-gel a 'good alternative' to cLMA in this scenario.
Link to abstract
0a6c1ae7-c4c3-4bcf-b3ef-71c97e9dbf1c|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Kohama H, Komasawa N, Ueki R, Kaminoh Y, Nishi S. Pediatr Int. 2015;57(1):180-2
Study on performance of air-Q, Ambu Aura-i and i-gel in a manikin simulation, undertaken by 22 novice physicians. Rate of success and insertion time with and without chest compressions were measured.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2015,
Kohama H,
Pediatr Int,
Manikin study,
Paediatric,
Novice users,
Chest compressions,
Resuscitation,
Infant,
Simulation,
Comparison trial,
vs air-Q,
vs Ambu Aura-i,
Free
75068e02-bd37-4608-b5bd-dac5540f665b|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Mukadder S, Zekine B, Erdogan KG, Ulku O, Muharrem U, Saim Y, Mahmut D. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:634320
105 patients were randomly distributed between the three device groups. Initial leak pressure, insertion time, ease of placement and airway morbidity results all favoured the i-gel.
Link to abstract
Tags :
2015,
Mukadder S,
ScienfiticWorldJournal,
Adult,
Anaesthesia,
Comparison trial,
vs ProSeal,
vs LMA Supreme,
Gynaecologic surgery,
Laparoscopic,
Free
03380d16-91cd-45cd-8f5f-d929cbc57416|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Kayhan GE, Begec Z, Sanli M, Gedik E, Durmus M. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:426186
50 patients were split between the two groups, with airway leak pressure the primary outcome measured. No significant differences were found here, however i-gel insertion time was shorter.
Link to abstract
ffb95468-880a-41e7-8cc3-c521c32915a5|1|3.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c
Mishra SK, Nawaz M, Satyapraksh MV, Parida S, Bidkar PU, Hemavathy B, Kundra P. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2015;2015:705869
After induction of anaesthesia and device insertion, head position was ranomly changed from neutral to flexion, extension and lateral rotation. Leak pressure, fibreoptic view and ventilation scores were among the results measured. Effective ventilation can be performed with both devices, but 'extreme precaution' should be taken in flexion position in ProSeal.
Link to abstract
d4d5bf38-bf8d-42cd-a560-59860003b9eb|0|.0|27604f05-86ad-47ef-9e05-950bb762570c